Incentive plan and bonus payments

190228_legal_bonus
During difficult economic times, there are often disputes over whether an employer is allowed to withhold incentive plan or bonus payments when an employee's contract is terminated. This dispute arose between Ms Wong and her employer about her entitlement under the company's incentive plan. Here is what was interpreted in the Hong Kong courtroom.

Whether bonus payment is discretionary

The case was not about whether how Ms Wong's entitlement was calculated. Instead, the employer argued that the features of her incentive plan all indicated that her bonus was discretionary. As such, they argued that they had the ultimate discretion to determine if her bonus should be awarded at all.

 

The employer also tried to argue that under the plan, all employees who left their employment before receiving their incentive payment would no longer be entitled to it - and that, as a result, Ms Wong would not be able to receive a payment.

She, on the other hand, argued that the incentive plan was a contractual end-of-year payment, although it did have some discretionary elements.

Is incentive plan seen as end-of-year payment?

In the end, the court decided that an employer's discretion over bonus payments could never be "unfettered"; in other words, it could not be free of restrictions. It also said that it must always be exercised "in good faith", and should not be "irrational" or "perverse".

 

Although the incentive plan involved certain discretionary elements, this discretion could only be properly exercised if it followed certain clearly identifiable and objective criteria. When an operating target was set, it had to refer to the company's track record and prospects. In addition, this assessment had to be based on an objective appraisal of the employee. Finally, the company's option to cancel could only be used if the company's financial health was "in jeopardy".

The employer's incentive plan therefore provided for a bonus based on a formula, rather than a discretionary bonus. As such, it was an "end of year payment" regulated by the Chapter 8 of Employment Ordinance, and was not payable at the discretion of the employer alone. A pro-rata payment therefore had to be paid to Ms Wong when her employment was terminated.

Disclaimer: This article serves as the provision of general information and reference only. It is not intended to be served or interpreted as any legal advice in any occasion, at any cost. Please seek professional help if you have any relevant legal issue.

⏩⏩  需要請人?立即刊登招聘廣告!  ⏪⏪

Advertisement

刊登招聘廣告
;
Follow CTgoodjobs for the latest career news, hot topics and recommended jobs!
Maybe Later Follow