ESG for the low income segment

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) is often presented as a universal good; its application can inadvertently create or exacerbate challenges for low-income segments.

In Hong Kong's intensely competitive and expensive environment, these problems are particularly acute.

Here are the key problems faced by the low-income segment in HK when dealing with ESG:

1. ESG is a Luxury They Cannot Afford

This is the most direct and significant problem. ESG-aligned products and services often come with a "green premium" or "ethical premium" that is out of reach.

• Green Products: Organic food, energy-efficient appliances (e.g., inverter air conditioners, LED lights), and sustainably sourced goods are almost always more expensive. For a family in a subdivided flat (SDU) choosing between a HK$20 regular lunchbox and a HK$50 "sustainable" one, the choice is dictated by survival, not ethics.
• Housing: They cannot choose to live in a modern, green-certified building with low energy costs. They are forced into older, poorly maintained buildings with terrible energy efficiency, leading to higher electricity bills as they struggle to cool down cramped, poorly ventilated spaces.

2. The "Poverty Penalty" in an ESG Context

Low-income households often end up paying more for basic utilities, contradicting the "E" principle of efficiency.

• Energy Inefficiency: Living in poorly insulated SDUs means air conditioners and heaters have to work harder, consuming more electricity and resulting in shockingly high bills that consume a larger portion of their income compared to wealthier households.
• Inability to Invest: They cannot afford the upfront cost of investments that lead to long-term savings, such as buying an energy-efficient refrigerator or installing a water-saving device. They are trapped in a cycle of high operational costs.

3. Exclusion from Green Finance and Benefits

The financial tools of ESG are not designed for them.

• Green Loans/FinTech: Many green financial products (e.g., loans for solar panels, ESG-themed investment funds) are targeted at corporations or affluent retail investors. A low-income individual lacks the capital, collateral, or credit history to access these products.
• Lack of incentive  that reward sustainable behavior (e.g., cashback for recycling, discounts for using reusable cups) are often digitalized and require smartphone literacy and banking integration, which can exclude the elderly or very poor.

4. Lack of  Choice

Their daily struggle for survival severely limits their ability to make choices based on ESG values.

• Employment: They often work in low-wage, high-pressure jobs in sectors not known for strong ESG practices (e.g., sanitation, logistics, catering). They cannot afford to choose an employer based on its governance or social ethics. Their priority is any job that pays.
• Consumer Choice: Their consumption is driven by the absolute lowest price. They cannot boycott a company with poor labor practices if that company's product is the cheapest available.
• Investor Voice: They have no voice as shareholders. ESG is often driven by investor activism, but low-income individuals do not hold shares in companies and therefore cannot influence corporate behavior through this channel.

5. Inaccessible Design and Digital Divide

Many ESG initiatives are designed for a tech-savvy, middle-class population.

• Digitalization: ESG reporting, sustainable investing apps, and information about eco-friendly products are primarily online. This excludes those with limited digital access or literacy.
• Complexity: The concepts and terminology of ESG (e.g., "net-zero," "carbon footprint," "impact investing") are alien and irrelevant to someone focused on making rent and putting food on the table.

6. The "S" is Overlooked:

Paradoxically, the core existence of a large low-income segment is a failure of the "Social" pillar of ESG within Hong Kong's own society. When companies use ESG metrics, they often overlook how their own operations contribute to this social problem.

• Wage Stagnation: Companies may boast about reducing plastic use (E) but fail to pay their frontline workers a living wage (S).
• Supply Chain Blindness: A corporation might have excellent governance in its headquarters but use suppliers (e.g., cleaning subcontractors) that exploit low-income workers with poverty wages and unstable contracts.
• Gentrification: "Green" urban renewal projects can push up property values and rents, displacing low-income communities and destroying existing social networks—a clear negative social outcome despite a positive environmental one.

7. Perception of ESG as Hypocritical or Irrelevant

For many in the low-income segment, corporate ESG initiatives can feel like hypocrisy ("greenwashing" / "social-washing").

• Priorities are Misaligned: A bank promoting a "green bond" while financing projects that lead to unaffordable housing seems contradictory.
• Lack of Tangible Benefit: They do not see how a company's ESG report translates into tangible improvements in their daily lives, such as lower rent, better wages, or healthier living conditions.

The central problem is that the low-income segment is often the most negatively affected by environmental and social failures (e.g., living in polluted areas, working in precarious jobs) but has the least capacity to influence or benefit from the ESG systems designed to address those very failures.

For ESG to be truly effective and just in Hong Kong, it must move beyond a corporate framework and explicitly include measures that address this inequity. This means:

• Prioritizing the "S" (Social): Focusing on living wages, affordable green housing, and financial inclusion.
• Designing Inclusive Solutions: Creating ESG initiatives that are accessible and beneficial to the poorest (e.g., subsidized energy-efficient retrofits for SDUs).
• Community-Led Approaches: Involving low-income communities in the design of ESG programs to ensure they are relevant and effective.

Until then, ESG risks being another domain where the inequalities of Hong Kong society are reinforced rather than diminished.

關於香港國金獅子會 (Lions Club of Hong Kong IFC)

香港國金獅子會於2017年創立，隸屬國際獅子總會中國港澳303區，創立的一年適逢是國際獅子總會成立100週年。國金獅子會的會員全數來自資本市場及金融銀行業界，是港澳地區最早一個由單一界別專業人士所組成的獅子會屬會。國金獅子會服務除了是圍繞著獅子總會服務範疇之外，還引入了聯合國SDG及ESG，尤其在社會(Society)的元素，對扶貧及青少年發展特別關注。除了以香港為服務基地之外，國金獅子會還主張無分國界、無分種族的服務。

以上內容及資料僅屬個別作者的個人意見，並不代表www.CTgoodjobs.hk的立場。CTgoodjobs對因以上人士張貼之資訊內容所帶來之損失或損害概不負責。